Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 2 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Datadog (Parigi)
Colloquio
I applied through LinkedIn to join Datadog Paris.
1. Phone interview with a technical recruiter. He was really nice and relevant.
• Tell me about you, your education ;
• What are you interested in ;
• What languages/tools do you feel comfortable with ;
• Other generic questions.
2. Screen interview with an engineer. The first part was about a personal project. It was very open ended, not sure what the interviewer was looking for beyond having a conversation.
• Tell me about a technical project you worked on ;
• Questions related to my project ;
• Two medium algorithm questions over video call on CoderPad : string manipulation and recursivity.
3. Take-home assignment to be done within 7 days. It takes 10-12h to complete. They expect robust and documented code. Take the time to detail your areas for improvement in your README.
• Write an HTTP log monitor.
I received a short feedback which was basically useless. Be careful, they seem to be excessively picky about this challenge.
4. Three on-site interviews (1h each).
• First interview: algorithm questions. String manipulation problem with several improvements to be done ;
• Second interview: system design. Open-ended problem where you have to design a large scale system ;
• Third interview: informal discussion with a tech lead. He had a lot of respect, enthusiasm, and interest.
The tech recruiter provided vague feedback after the on-site.
My experience was neutral. The recruitment process was too long. I only received positive feedback throughout the steps, except for the system design interview where I slightly underperformed. This apparently caused my rejection. I feel like I have invested a lot of energy, and their explanations did not really convinced me. Also, an HR promised me that my transportation costs would be reimbursed, but this is still not the case after two months. Other than that, the people I met were really nice.
One knowledge interview and one technical interview afterwards. Knowledge was fine. During the tech one, the interviewer was not listening. The problem was a standard one. Got rejected after second round.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Knapsack problem with coins, solved via dynamic programming
Screening RH, qui mentor durant le process, puis deux rounds, le deuxième avec 4 test différents. Bon feedback tout du long. C'est fluide et le RH est là pour aider à préparer les sujets.
El proceso constó de tres fases principales. Primero, apliqué online a un puesto de trabajo disponible. Posteriormente, pasé a una entrevista técnica de aproximadamente una hora, enfocada principalmente en el desarrollo, integración y securización de APIs. También discutimos estrategias de despliegue, monitorización y gestión de recursos en la nube utilizando el ecosistema de Azure. Por último, realizamos un ejercicio conversacional sobre buenas prácticas de código y arquitectura. Fue un proceso fluido y el equipo fue muy profesional.
Le migliori aziende per "stipendio e benefit" vicino a te