First step was completely online where you had to answer some general questions and record your response and after that they demanded some position related tasks to be completed. This was all fine, but the second step was horrible. The interviewers were really down, one of them had a very strong accent, which made it hard to understand the questions. But also, they were confused by their own questions and they were typing my answers while I was speaking which is why there was no eye contact, and they kept missing my answers and asking over again or summing it up as the opposite of what I would say. It was horrible, very inexperienced.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
The manager asked me the question of his life: What do you expect from me?
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un'altra fonte. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Wise (Budapest)
Colloquio
First a test with 2 fake emails in which you have to answer as a customer service representative then interview by zoom with one of the team leaders at the offices in budapest
Online interview with lovely recruiter who set me at ease. More of a conversation that strict interview questions. Really set me at ease and got the most out of me.
The process sounded straight-froward, you pass the initial pre-screening, then you receive a take-home test, after that one would get an online interview (this is a huge upgrade from the previous talk-to-the-screen style they had before).
What's really disappointing & unprofessional, is not providing feedback of the test scores, especially that this is used as a critical factor (so they say) in the hiring process.
It's one of the least transparent hiring processes I've went through in 15 years career!
