employer cover photo
employer logo

Nice company to work for but not perfect - Recensione dipendente - Senior Staff Scientist presso AER

3,0
10 mar 2017
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Smart and motivated co-workers - Interesting projects related to environmental challenges facing society

Svantaggi

- Compensation is lower than possible for education and work experience - Vesting for the 401k is not great as it takes 6 years to be fully vested and the match is only 75% of what you contribute up to 6% of your salary. This is convoluted. - Issues with funding for projects led to several layoffs that affected morale

Esplora altre recensioni su AER

5,0
22 ott 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Flexibility. Freedom to do self-directed research in the field. Time to develop as a scientist. Working with modern problems in space weather. Interesting topics and problems. Safe work environment. Extremely nice and intelligent peers and colleagues. A community of devoted scientists.

Svantaggi

The pay is low. Raises are rare.

3,0
9 ott 2015
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Top-notch science. Smart co-workers. Family friendly (flexible hours, kid's holiday party with gifts). Good benefits (no or low health deductibles, 401k match, ESOP through parent company). Accomplishments are acknowledged and highlighted in company meetings. Hybrid of academia and corporate worlds.

Svantaggi

Low pay (10 to 20% below market). Large raises (greater than 3%) only if you threaten to quit with another job offer. Accomplishments are not rewarded (Employees of the year only get a paper certificate in a plastic frame). Company is completely reliant on government contracts (essentially a consulting company) so if there are no new contracts in the pipeline, your job is not secure. They have not been able to replace the "big" contract that is winding down. Therefore there is little to no opportunity for growth and promotions (company isn't growing and upper management rarely turns over). Support departments (HR, Finance, IT) are understaffed, overworked and treated as disposable and easily replaceable (they are seen as overhead or cost centers as opposed to being positioned as a corporate resource). Decision making often based upon cost, not upon needs. Traditional old school inflexible top down corporate management and culture. Little to no formal training available.

4
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto