-Mediocre pay (despite what leadership may tell you about being paid market rates, you're still probably/will be under paid.)
-High turnover
-There are many individuals in leadership positions who probably, in my opinion, shouldn't be, including those in the c-suite
-"Flexible PTO": open/flexible/unlimited PTO policies largely benefit the company itself rather than its workers, despite how leadership may frame the "benefit" (e.g. "No PTO accruals or balances!") 1. It's a well-known fact that workers at organizations with such policies take fewer days off on average (13) than workers who accrue time off. 2. Since workers don't accrue, or earn time off, the company isn't obligated to pay them out upon departure. 3. The company benefits from this seemingly anti-worker policy financially, like demonstrated in the second point, since they're no longer required to record PTO as a liability in their financial statements.
-It seems like certain reviews, like the one titled "Empowering and Supportive Workplace" from May 18, 2022, may have been written by HR or someone influenced by HR/leadership in an effort to artificially inflate the average rating and overall sentiment. Disappointing if that's the case.