Great Employees, Horrible Management - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Carter Machinery

2,0
4 ott 2019
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Coworkers were great. Some of the best guys you’ll ever meet. Pay/benefits are decently competitive. Desk job employees seem to actually like the company. Carter University is a good learning resource and their in house trainers are relatable and good teachers. That being said, the classes are mostly made by CAT and show the proper way of doing things. Carter uses little to none of the processes you’re taught so it’s almost pointless. They put a lot of money back into the company in an effort to make the facilities look nicer.

Svantaggi

If you care about the quality of your work, this is not the company for you. The profit is the only thing they care about. Parts junk and won’t live a full rebuild lifetime? Reuse it anyway. Parts washer didn’t completely clean a part and left dirt all over it? Put it on anyway, we’ll blow time standards if we take the time to do it right. Carter is not the company it was years ago. There is absolutely zero quality control. If you have your engines rebuilt here now, you should be looking elsewhere. If you have a family or care at all about anything outside of the workplace, this is not the company for you. 50-60 hour work weeks are common. Most of the top performers are in there more than that. Abusing Adderall or other prescription drugs to achieve this productivity is common. This is the best example of a company I’ve ever seen that acts like they care about safety, but only allocate enough time to do a task in the unsafe way. Or better yet, when they redesign an area and don’t put in cranes that are tall enough to remove heavy parts from the larger engines. When management is told of said issue, nothing is done about it. But if/when someone gets hurt due to practices like this, it’s their fault and they’re let go. Lower-mid management cares more about their bonus check for staying under budget than getting needed supplies or equipment. Weekend shift at Salem needs a new supervisor or the current one throughly retrained. A severe lack of social skills, technology related skills, problem solving and process management skills doesn’t create a very good work experience for those under him. Good technicians don’t go into management, whether this is their own choice or the company’s I don’t know. You either end up with the worst technician as your supervisor or a manager hired from the outside with no experience in diesel mechanics. Either way, you end up with someone who doesn’t understand how to do your job or the complications you’ll run into. Business comes and goes mainly depending on politics. Not a con for this company specifically, just heavy equipment companies in general.

Esplora altre recensioni su Carter Machinery

5,0
4 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people here are amazing! Teams genuinely care about doing the right thing for customers and for each other. Leadership is approachable, and there’s a strong emphasis on safety, teamwork, and continuous improvement. I’ve had opportunities to grow, take on new challenges, and contribute ideas that actually get implemented. We are committed to growth and efficiency. I can't wait to see what the future holds for Carter Machinery!

Svantaggi

Like any fast growing company, processes can take time to continue to evolve, and change can be challenging at times—but leadership is dedicated to making the right decisions and they are always open to feedback and improvement.

2,0
11 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Strong brand recognition, talented coworkers across many departments, and opportunities to work on large-scale campaigns and partnerships. There are good people throughout the organization who genuinely care about customers and the company’s legacy. The scale of the business also gives teams access to interesting projects and recognizable brands.

Svantaggi

There was often a disconnect between leadership expectations and the realities of modern marketing and creative work. Strategy frequently shifted based on stakeholder pressure rather than channel performance or audience behavior, making it difficult to build long-term momentum. Work-life balance could also be inconsistent. Non-urgent requests regularly became after-hours priorities, and expectations around flexibility and in-office attendance evolved over time compared to what had originally been discussed during hiring. In some cases, concerns around marketing practices, platform strategy, or compliance-related risks did not feel like they were taken seriously enough when raised internally. This created an environment where employees could feel pressured to prioritize speed and stakeholder satisfaction over thoughtful execution, including situations involving copyright usage, sweepstakes processes, and other avoidable reputational risks. Turnover appeared to continue increasing, while concerns around management practices often did not seem to result in meaningful organizational changes. There were also situations that, from my perspective, reflected poorly on how some employees were treated during periods of transition or separation from the company. While the Carter culture as presented externally is strong, my experience was that certain management behaviors made it difficult to consistently foster collaboration, role clarity, and long-term team trust. In practice, relationship management and alignment with leadership personalities sometimes appeared to carry more weight than clearly defined responsibilities or measurable performance.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto