From a Thriving Startup Culture to a Toxic Work Environment - Recensione dipendente - Product Manager presso Level Access

1,0
24 set 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Unlimited vacation and sick days off - Culture of 100% remote work

Svantaggi

My experience at the company was excellent until Level Access acquired it. While it was still eSSENTIAL Accessibility, the company had a strong startup culture. There was a focus on continuous learning and genuine employee care. However, after the acquisition, everything changed drastically. As the processes from both companies began to merge, I found myself working 10 to 11 hours a day. Initially, I thought this would be a temporary situation due to the transition, but it dragged on for months. The pressure to deliver results to investors became overwhelming, and the previously supportive startup culture was replaced by one of fear and constant stress. Despite the long hours, the workload kept increasing. I was managing a large product area and frequently requested my manager to divide the responsibilities, but he consistently refused. In addition to overseeing multiple existing products with various features, I was also developing a new product from scratch. With no VP or Product Director in place, our Chief Product Officer (CPO) acted as my direct manager. Naturally, he didn’t have enough time to provide proper guidance and this lack of continuity and support became a recurring issue. When the product I was working on became critical to the company's success, the CPO began to publicly challenge my prioritization decisions during meetings with other team members. However, he never offered assistance or clear guidance on how to improve the situation. At one point, he made a comment implying that if I liked to "clock out at 6 PM," this job might not be right for me. He also mentioned that he enjoyed "playing" with ChatGPT at 1 or 2 AM, or even during weekends because he loved what he did. He suggested that I should reflect on how I was spending my time and hinted that I should be working late nights if necessary. Although he never directly asked me to work outside of regular hours, it was clear that he expected it. He also remarked that the company "wasn’t a university" and that the time for learning was over—a statement that contradicts the best practices in product development, where continuous learning is essential. After hearing these comments from my manager, being on the verge of burnout, and after my therapist described my situation as one of clear abuse, I decided to leave the company. It’s shocking how a company with a toxic culture can destroy the positive environment of an acquired company, turning it into an unhealthy and unsustainable workplace.

Esplora altre recensioni su Level Access

5,0
26 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Strong emphasis on collaboration One company, one vision Leader in the A11Y Industry Recognition for contributions and excellence

Svantaggi

Some growing pains Late AI presence, but better everyday

1,0
28 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

A handful of employees who genuinely care and try to hold things together Remote flexibility Mission sounds good on paper

Svantaggi

Management is completely disconnected from the reality of the business. The executive leadership team operates without a clear strategy, and decisions often feel reactive, rushed, or based on internal politics rather than what the company actually needs. There is no long‑term vision. Priorities change constantly, teams are left scrambling, and no one at the top seems to understand the operational or financial state of the company. Individuals are placed in positions of influence without the experience or business understanding needed to guide major decisions. This creates confusion, poor direction, and a culture where the wrong voices have the loudest say. Communication from leadership is vague, inconsistent, and often contradicts itself. Employees are expected to “figure it out” with little support or clarity. Morale is extremely low. People are burned out, frustrated, and tired of watching leadership make choices that hurt the business and the employees who are trying to keep it afloat. HR is not a safe or supportive function here. Under the CHRO, the department feels more focused on protecting leadership than supporting employees. Concerns are dismissed, issues go unaddressed, and employees quickly learn that HR is not a place to seek help or transparency. The company talks about values, accessibility, and integrity, but the internal culture does not reflect any of those things.

6
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto