employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Marriott Vacations Worldwide

Questa è la tua azienda?

Great benefits and engaging team but high pressure politics - Recensione dipendente - Human Resources Manager presso Marriott Vacations Worldwide

2,0
27 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Generous company sponsored benefits and perks like the hotel room discount. Fun industry environment working in resorts and interacting with vacationing families. Highly engaged team environment.

Svantaggi

Highly political environment. Most decisions at a senior management level are influenced by who you know, who you like— and don’t. High perception of favoritism all across the company. Most people stay and come back for the generous company sponsored benefits and perks like the hotel room discount (highly popular and abused by employees). The overall employee loyalty is highly based on the “Marriott” brand though the affiliation is solely based on a franchise agreement— not as the parent company as it used to be years before MVW was spun off from Marriott International in 2011. High pressure, fast paced environment, HR is overloaded with responsibilities doing the job of 2 or 3 people with no room for errors allowed; if you drop the ball somewhere, your performance is “questionable” and everyone in the HR chain gets involved or copied on no matter how small the issue is.

Esplora altre recensioni su Marriott Vacations Worldwide

5,0
3 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

All of it growth potential and the ability to provide for my family based on what I do for the company

Svantaggi

Pressure is a privilege. !

2,0
22 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Bebefits like medical were good.

Svantaggi

During my employment as a Quality Assurance employee, I experienced clear unequal treatment compared to colleagues in the same position. Westbound QA employees were not required to clock in and out for lunch, while Eastbound QA employees like myself were required to do so — despite holding identical job classifications. As an hourly employee, this meant I was regularly working unpaid time during mandatory "break" periods. This was not a minor oversight — it was a policy applied unequally between teams. When I raised this concern directly to my manager, instead of acknowledging the legitimate issue, my manager responded by threatening to file an internal HR complaint against me — claiming I had raised my voice in a customer area. I did not raise my voice. Rather than addressing the problem, my manager used this as an opportunity to discourage me from speaking up further. This entire conversation was recorded with my manager's full knowledge and consent. Additionally, a senior manager in my department consistently declined notarization requests from the sales team, redirecting all notary work to me despite being equally qualified. When I was finally given authorization by the Director to take my 30-minute break, I returned to find 7 notarization documents piled on my desk — the senior manager had declined to handle them during my authorized absence.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto