La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Airwallex
Colloquio
First interview with recruiter for screening, second interview with hiring manager for background and achievements, third interview with a VP to run through an assignment. The assignment took around 6-8 hours . The hiring manager was really polite and sharp. The VP was a bit clueless from payments and was asking some generic questions having a specific answer on his mind expecting to listen that one. The recruiter contacted me with a very poor and vague rejection reason. I responded asked for feedback but never got a response back. At least you should give some valid feedback to someone wasted 10 hours at this process. Recruiters are very bad at this company. The irony: after the process ended, they sent me a questionnaire to complete a survey and give them feedback. I did it.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Previous experience, how do you handle tough work situations, normal questions etc.
initial recruiter talked with me, then was passed to hiring manager for discussion. there is a framework but it deviates quite a lot from the original question so you need to be flexible with how the conversation is going
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
- asked about experience
- asked how to improve X
- product sense
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Airwallex (Singapore)
Colloquio
Product Manager Role:
- asked about situational and also how agentic commerce and AI can be applicable to the role
- The interviewer was pretty nice, and respectful - providing guidance on question
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Airwallex
Colloquio
One of those where you get encouraged to apply by their recruiter and then you get rejected after stage 1 for "being overqualified". The worst part? Lack of feedback, even when requested.