a preliminary psychometric test that was bypassed in my case for urgency. The interview process was not transparent, the timelines & next steps the mentioned during the fist interview were not respected. Even the fact that the role was a replacement for a person who was leaving was not mentioned when there's really no need to hide that. There was a case study that I was supposed to present to their client, which was poorly written and reflected little knowledge of the sector, after spending 40+ hours preparing, I never got to present it. Like the other review- which I saw too late , I found the process disrespectful, and non transparent- I would also add that after being in that industry myself for many years, I found their industry knowledge/ competence questionable in the little interactions I had. If you are considering a career in venture capital - please think twice.

Six interviews through three months period (including a preliminar Q&A recorded for pre-selection). After that, by the end of the process, it took almost three aditional months for a feedback. Urgent in the beggining, displicent after the process had ended. Unrespectful with applicants.