I was contacted quickly after applying, which initially seemed like a positive sign. The first interview was with a recruiter, and while I expected a standard screening, it turned out to be surprisingly in-depth with questions that felt more suited to a hiring manager and outside the typical scope of a recruiter. What stood out most, and has bothered me since, was the request to use AI to "take notes," which in practice meant recording my responses. I was asked if I was okay with it, and like most candidates, I agreed to avoid seeming difficult, but I had immediate concerns about how that transcript would be used or interpreted internally. When I wasn’t moved forward and saw the role reposted shortly afterward, it became clear that hiring decisions were likely being made based solely on that AI-generated transcript. This kind of process may favor candidates who sound polished in the moment, but it overlooks real expertise, proven outcomes, and long-term potential. Just a tip, Cubby Beds: in my experience, smooth talkers aren’t usually your top performers; in fact, they’re often among the most disappointing hires. Ultimately, if a company takes such a shallow approach to hiring, it likely reflects a broader lack of strategic thinking and that’s not a place I’d feel confident investing my time or skills.