I interviewed for the Associate role before it had first been filled, beginning with a Zoom screen with the CIO. Thereafter, I met with nearly all the senior people on the team I'd be joining as well as teams adjacent to the one I'd be joining. Each was a one on one or two on one interview format, usually with video. There were no technical questions. The feedback I got after each stage was very positive, but I was ultimately unsuccessful for an unknown reason. The team seemed serious but nice, and I was looking forward to the opportunity. My only advice to other candidates for roles at this firm would be to not let interviewing for a position interfere too heavily with your other responsibilities, as there will be a minimum of 10 or so rounds with 10+ individuals. Press EPIQ to give you a speedy answer. The interview process is overly long to ensure a cultural fit, though perceptions of the culture seem to vary person to person and between those in SF, NV, and TX. As a growing firm I understand why certain elements of the process were unrefined, but the process was admittedly a "too many cooks in the kitchen" type approach. A two or three round set of interviews with a case study would have been preferred, as I'm still left with the feeling my skills went untested after 6-7+ hrs in the interview chair.