Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite l'università. La procedura ha richiesto 3 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Epic (New York, NY) nel mese di ott 2017
Colloquio
The online coding assessment was the worst experience I've ever had interviewing with a company. It was labeled as a "non-technical skills assessment", and I was told it would involve critical thinking and problem solving. Instead I had to code a solution to 4 questions that took me a half hour each. This was not even the worst part. In order to begin this "non-technical technical skills assesment", I had to go through the proctorU service, which monitored me the entirety of the test. This involved me showing the proctor my entire room and showing them I had moved my phone out of reach. I was treated like a kid who might cheat on a high school exam, and it only makes me wonder how they might treat their employees.
2
Altre recensioni di colloqui per Software Developer presso Epic
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Colloquio
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.