The whole process was smooth and practical. They focused more on real coding and less on tricky theory or puzzles, which I appreciated. The time limit in the first round was a bit challenging, but fair. The second round felt more like a conversation than a grilling session. Overall, a solid and well-organized experience. The interview had two rounds: 1. Hands-on App Task (1.5 hours): In the first round, I had to build a small app within 90 minutes. It was a timed task that allowed them to see how I approach real-world problems. The instructions were clear, and the evaluation primarily focused on coding skills and the app's functionality. 2. Technical Discussion (1 hour): The second round wasn’t about the code I wrote in the first round. Instead, it was more of an open-ended technical conversation. We discussed real-world scenarios, how I would approach certain problems, design decisions, state management, and performance considerations. It felt more like a knowledge-sharing session than a typical Q&A round, which I found refreshing.

It was in 4 rounds First round is live coding round based on the tech stack that you have applied for Second is technical discussion on the skill Third is client round Fourth is cultural fit round