Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Stripe nel mese di lug 2026
Colloquio
started with a quick recruiter chat (checking developer infrastructure know-how), followed by a 45-min live coding screen where they look for production ready code. onsite was 5 rounds: coding, bug bash, integration, system design, and behavioral. bug bash was the most interesting part. they just drop you into a random repo with failing tests and watch how you track down the root cause. integration is pure API work - reading docs and wiring things up, but they lean heavy on error handling. sys design felt very grounded. instead of drawing huge scalable architecture, we basically just talked through failure modes and backward compatibility.behavioral was standard. across the board, stripe cares way more about readable code and communication than tricky algorithms.for prep, practice reading other people's code and fixing bugs. i had a mock on prepfully with a stripe SWE to test my bug bash process, and it really highlighted some messy debugging habits i had. tough loop, but it actually feels like real engineering.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Given a stream of Stripe checkout session events, identify sessions abandoned at each step of the checkout flow and calculate conversion rates
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Stripe (Bucarest, )
Colloquio
1 round of team screen - go/no go with a multi step problem
Design - classic interview
Integration - work on integrating some new systems
Bug bash - find and solve a bug
Programming exercise - same as team screen maybe a bit harder
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Stripe (Dublino, Dublino)
Colloquio
The position was in Dublin, but I interviewed with someone on the West Coast, which was where I was located at the time. The tech question round was multi-leveled as in build X, then add Y, then adapt for Z. Essentially, based on whatever "system", add these functions and change them to handle the input/output/question of the system. The interviewer was nice and better than 1-2 other companies I'd interviewed with in regards to responsiveness, communication, friendliness, etc.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Given a "system", build one function, then add another, then adapt and build something else. From a design-build problem, it was actually rather pleasant; the issue is that you spend a lot of time expecting interview questions and get tripped up on solving the "real-world problem" they give you.