Extreme Difference in Quality of Workforce - Recensione dipendente - Engineer presso CDM Smith

3,0
1 giu 2016
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Interesting projects. Global company. Privately held. Opportunities.

Svantaggi

Lots of older workers who want the status quo despite flat line revenue growth for the past five years. Lots of fiefdoms. Older workers are in management because of engineering successes yet do not have a clue as to how to manage. Old school. Poor systems - nothing integrated. Newer workers are better but overall staff is B quality due to old school system for retention. Name is not widely known so perspective employers are not that impressed as I am finding out.

Esplora altre recensioni su CDM Smith

5,0
22 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Lots of training and opportunities

Svantaggi

Company structure can be confusing

1
avatar
Risposta di CDM Smith
1mo
Thank you for taking the time to leave us a 5-star review! It was great to have you as an employee and wish you all the best in your future endeavors.
2,0
18 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Flexible hybrid schedule is very nice and starting salary is high for early career engineers.

Svantaggi

The main people running the company are not engineers and you can tell. They are all focused on utilization with rates often set at 97% or higher. This had led to my supervisor asking/telling me to not charge company required trainings. As an early engineer it really feels like they don't want to invest in me and only care about their bottom line. If you are an early career structural engineer you will also not get any meaningful work until you've been with the company for at least 5 years. The senior engineers do not trust you and will only give you grunt work.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto