Big Corporation with Big Contracts - Lacks Innovation and Creativity - Recensione dipendente - Senior Consultant presso CGI

2,0
8 nov 2015
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

CGI has lots of long-term contracts and is a very big corporation itself. Employees are paid every two weeks and employee benefits are very good. Employees can be confident that they will be paid on-time every 2 weeks and are provided health care, short-term disability, and long-term disability insurance. One of the best benefits is a stock purchase plan in which the company matches employee contributions up to 3% of the employee's salaries.

Svantaggi

Many of the managers and directors have been with the organization for a long time. And they do not relate well to young and/or talented employees. Moreover, many of the managers and directors focus more on the status quo than the future and many are closed minded to new ideas. Much of the work can be very tedious and monotonous... many employees find the work to be quite boring. Senior consultants are typically hired for a specific role on a specific account. And it is difficult to move to a role on another account. Communications between accounts is very limited and most employees will only communicate with other employees on their own account. And as an employee, there is very little feeling of belonging to a team and being able to help the company be successful. Company retention is poor, and attrition of talented employees is a problem.

Esplora altre recensioni su CGI

5,0
18 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Work life balance, growth, quality

Svantaggi

Less pay compared to market

1,0
16 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Svantaggi

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto