Good to Start Out - Don't Stay too long - No Severance - Recensione dipendente - Sr Consultant presso CGI

2,0
13 set 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great benefits. You may get trapped with how good those are with great healthcare and all the Government Holidays you can handle. This company works on a projects - once that project is over you are out looking for another job. It's a great place if you find someone (like a Director or VP) who will take you along for the ride.

Svantaggi

I spent 9 years there and never moved up because I always jumped on and off projects. And when it was finally over and there were no Sr Consultant projects left? They found a way to not provide any severance. They made sure I was offered a job that was too far away for me to handle. 9 Years no severance. Watch out at CGI - they may dish you a sour bag of beans in the end. However, it is a great place to start your career, learn about government contracts - then leave. If you get on the wrong project - there may be tons and tons of overtime. They give you this line "Those that step up we will remember" or something like that. They never did remember me. However, I always got great ratings.

Esplora altre recensioni su CGI

5,0
1 lug 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

work life balance was great

Svantaggi

Little ability to move up in career

1,0
16 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Svantaggi

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto