Great start that fizzled out - Recensione dipendente - Solutions Architect presso Capgemini

3,0
21 set 2017
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

1.No Gender Bias, physically challenged bias etc., 2. Good projects in Europe 3. Initial pay package is generally good 4. Sort of a cut above the regular Indian IT services company

Svantaggi

1. Poor work life balance 2. Not employee centric management - not even a bit. One would expect some balance here as Cap has French roots 3. Crazy pre-sales team that makes unrealistic commitments to European clients - you know they are going to hold you to your word/contract literally! 4. mid-senior management not very mature 5. Many project managers have been working for several years in the company and have a turf attitude.

avatar
Risposta di Capgemini
8y
Thank you for your review. We truly appreciate your feedback on our diversity and inclusion focus. You have raised some serious concerns about our operations which we will alert to the right department. We can assure you that our entire management teams are channelizing efforts for better employee experience and satisfaction. We are continuously re-evaluating policies and procedures to ensure that our employees are at the core of everything we do. We hear you on your concerns and will take this feedback into consideration.

Esplora altre recensioni su Capgemini

5,0
5 lug 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Svantaggi

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

there are no pros for this company

Svantaggi

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto