Great Company with Room for Improvement - Recensione dipendente - Senior Associate presso Capgemini

4,0
27 gen 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great medical, dental, vision options (low deductibles, low semi-monthly payments) Competitive salaries ESOP Parental Leave Coverage Infertility Coverage Good learning tool Good management A lot of career opportunities Flexible WFH (especially during COVID) depending on your job type Flexible work arrangements available but dependent on job and management approval

Svantaggi

No VC or annual bonus for lower level employees Only 7 public holidays (New Year's, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, the day after Thanksgiving, Christmas) No Profit Sharing Parental Leave is 6 weeks for Primary / 2 weeks for Secondary @ 2/3 pay up to 1000/week - mid ranged among competitors so it could be better Not enough infertility pharma coverage (10k lifetime max - not enough for even 1 round of IVF) / infertility medical coverage is an additional 10k lifetime max Laptops/hardware - cheap and perform like such Expectation to work 50-70+ hours a week (including weekends) is the company culture

avatar
Risposta di Capgemini
5y
Thank you for your four-star review and for sharing your appreciation of the benefits you enjoyed.

Esplora altre recensioni su Capgemini

5,0
4 lug 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great place to work - depending on the market unit

Svantaggi

Depends on which market unit you work fir

1,0
30 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

there are no pros for this company

Svantaggi

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto