Worst MSP to work for - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Capgemini

2,0
7 set 2023
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Above average pay for call center tech support role with benefits if you opt in. Company will place you in a temporary bench if/when client you're assigned to ends contract and awaiting new assignment, with pay during the time waiting, but the max time is subject to change at any time per company's decision. If the team your on is short staffed, it won't stay that way for long.

Svantaggi

They will claim there's possibility to move to another role/client after being with them for a year... But what they won't say is that if you want to advance to anything beyond call center that there is no growth opportunities unless you move to India and apply to join their offshore company/division instead. They will lie and tell you that you gain increase in pay upon positive annual review... What they don't tell you is that even if you do get a good annual review there's no guarantee you get pay raise... might as well expect it to simply not happen unless you get promoted instead... but to what when there's no roles available to get promoted to? Starting to see the problem? They do not stay consistent with any promises they make, including those made during interview process.

Esplora altre recensioni su Capgemini

5,0
25 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Svantaggi

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1,0
30 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

there are no pros for this company

Svantaggi

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto