Good place to work although organisational structure changes often - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Danone

4,0
5 mar 2019
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Large corporation with theoretically good opportunities for mobility Opinions are encouraged even if changes are implemented very slowly Teamwork is fostered and encouraged Good pay and benefits A fair amount of strategic decisions are made based on scientific evidence where applicable

Svantaggi

Far too few HR employees per headcount. Distant and uninterested HR staff (I met my HR 'business partner' on my exit interview and she was not interested on why I was leaving, didn't even pretend to take notes). Performance reviews seldom if ever bottom up Subjective judgement from senior management weighs considerably sometimes (and in my experience may be biased by gender and nationality) Mid-level management does not follow through on commitments Presented plans and career paths are not followed Re-structuring happening constantly

avatar
Risposta di Danone
7y
Thank you very much for your honest opinion. I am happy to read about to read all the things you appreciate at Danone. Yet, thank you for the feedback about what we should keep working on to grow. We wish you all the best for your future.

Esplora altre recensioni su Danone

5,0
30 apr 2026
Stagista anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great people, highly structured, unique learning opportunities

Svantaggi

Team was fully remote so sometimes a bit difficult to communicate with everyone

1,0
3 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Work-life balance exists and is generally respected. Bonuses can be good, depending on the year and leadership priorities. Strong, reputable brands that look impressive on a résumé. "Some" genuinely great people who work hard despite the environment.

Svantaggi

No meritocracy whatsoever. Promotions and career growth are driven by favoritism, internal alliances, and visibility politics rather than performance or results. Advancement often feels like a popularity contest. “Core values” are largely performative. They are referenced often but ignored when inconvenient, especially at leadership levels. Questionable long-term strategy. Direction changes frequently, priorities shift without explanation, and long-term planning feels weak or reactive. Extremely bureaucratic. Simple decisions require excessive approvals, slowing execution and stifling innovation. Politics over performance. Success depends more on who you align with than what you deliver. If you're not "one of them" or if they don't want to continue paying you your value, they'll find ways to get rid of you. So choose wisely and research the role and team.

5
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto