Great People, Bad Upper Management, Poor Rewards and No Bonus for 2026 (No Appreciation of Talent) - Recensione dipendente - Anonymous Employee presso Dyson

2,0
10 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people in Dyson are nice and good at their work, and the working environment is decent. The middle managers are fine, and most of the rank and file are able to effectively accomplish their tasks. The work life balance is good, and I have had a great experience with regards to WLB and learning new things up till 2024 before the mass layoffs happened.

Svantaggi

Lost upper management who supposedly wish to leverage on the latest technologies but have made no clear and concerted effort to do so, poor compensation and low morale due to a lack of dialogue and understanding of the rank and file in the company. No bonus in 2026 for the majority of the company (achieving performance) despite the company almost achieving its financial goals and increasing profit by a significant amount year on year. Ridiculous that a rugby team was bought just when the no bonus announcement was made. Shows how much the company appreciates its talent !

Esplora altre recensioni su Dyson

5,0
9 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great people, great environment, fast paced

Svantaggi

Too early to tell but nothing so far

2,0
18 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

solid products. that is where it ends

Svantaggi

Working at Dyson was a mixed experience, but ultimately one that fell short of expectations. While the brand itself is innovative and well-regarded, the internal environment didn’t always reflect that same level of excellence. Leadership was a consistent challenge. There often seemed to be a disconnect between management and the day-to-day realities of employees, which made it difficult to feel supported or aligned on priorities. Decision-making could feel unclear or top-down, with limited transparency or input from teams actually executing the work. Compensation was another downside. Pay did not feel competitive with the broader market, especially considering the expectations and workload. This made it harder to stay motivated long-term and contributed to concerns about career growth and recognition. A major structural issue was the dynamic between the UK headquarters and the U.S. market. Despite the U.S. being the company’s largest and most important market, key decisions were still heavily controlled by the UK HQ. This often led to strategies that didn’t fully reflect the needs or realities of the U.S. business, creating friction and inefficiencies. Overall, while Dyson has strong products and brand equity, the employee experience—particularly in terms of leadership, compensation, and organizational structure—leaves room for improvement.

5
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto