Elanco Animal Health - A Great Place to Work - Recensione dipendente - Senior Technical Consultant presso Elanco

5,0
17 lug 2020
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I work with a team of veterinarians, nutritionists and animal scientists that have no ego. We are a team and no one worries about who gets credit. We work together to help our farm animal veterinarians and livestock producers have a healthier herd and a more profitable business. Our senior leadership team is humble, transparent and inspiring. Jeff Simmons , our CEO should run for President of the US. He is a tremendous leader.

Svantaggi

It is easy to overload your schedule because you want to say "yes" to every exciting opportunity to help your colleagues and serve our customers.

Esplora altre recensioni su Elanco

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Treats interns well by providing PTO during the summer shut down

Svantaggi

Didn't really have any issues with the internship.

2,0
20 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Svantaggi

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto