Nice people, poor leadership - Recensione dipendente - Principal Research Scientist presso Elanco

2,0
9 ott 2020
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Really nice people, made a lot of friends there, and lots of autonomy. A good place to develop as a scientist. Access to information is fairy open and you can forge your own path there if you want. Elanco actually does a very good job at manufacturing products, probably the best run part of the business.

Svantaggi

Senior leadership needs complete overhaul. When asked, "what is it that Elanco can do better than anyone else", most employees would say "strategic acquisitions." But that's not the most important thing...developing and selling new products for animal health should be what Elanco is best at. Management is just adequate (at best), and to grow and improve, Elanco need excellent leadership and management. The poor management has led to multiple lay-offs, restructurings, re-orgs over the last 5 years, creating a huge amount of instability in the business and the lives of the people that work there.

avatar
Risposta di Elanco
5y
Thank you for taking the time to give your honest and thorough review.

Esplora altre recensioni su Elanco

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Treats interns well by providing PTO during the summer shut down

Svantaggi

Didn't really have any issues with the internship.

2,0
20 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Svantaggi

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto