Trust is broken at this company - Recensione dipendente - Management presso Elanco

2,0
30 giu 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

1) Benefits are decent 2) Most employees are friendly 3) Employees want to do a good job

Svantaggi

1) Short staffed everywhere 2) Overload of work happening again 3) Massive hours that affect quality of life 4) Trust is broken between the company and employees 5) Lack of real vision by CEO and messages delivered by cheerleader speeches 6) People continue to turn in exit notices leaving the rest with extra work 7) Only able to hire any employees via the India Center 8) Have to work during your time off 9) Board of directors don't care and can't even pronounce the company name 10) High performers will get lost here due to the overload of tasks

avatar
Risposta di Elanco
3y
More than 20 years with Elanco – wow! Our transformation over the last two decades would not have been possible without the effort and commitment of our people. Thank you staying onboard and helping become a leader in animal health! Your feedback is appreciated and passed on to the management team.

Esplora altre recensioni su Elanco

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Treats interns well by providing PTO during the summer shut down

Svantaggi

Didn't really have any issues with the internship.

2,0
20 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Svantaggi

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto