Good cause, good people, bad business - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Elanco

3,0
15 gen 2023
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

You get to work with high integrity, smart, and passionate people Mission driven purpose Fun, growing industry

Svantaggi

No real strategy or long term planning (always in fire drill mode) The integration with Bayer brought in good talent but was clearly a financial mistake and continues to put constraints on the ability to invest in the future No ability to plan. Constant budget cuts

avatar
Risposta di Elanco
3y
Thanks for your comments. Elanco’s people, passion and purpose make us who we are and that’s driving our Innovation, Portfolio, and Productivity (IPP) strategy forward as we become a leader in animal health reaching the world's animals.

Esplora altre recensioni su Elanco

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Treats interns well by providing PTO during the summer shut down

Svantaggi

Didn't really have any issues with the internship.

2,0
20 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Svantaggi

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto