Significant lack of Diversity - Recensione dipendente - Director presso Elanco

2,0
15 ago 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Passion for the industry to help pets is great and has momentum!

Svantaggi

Gender diversity especially in finance leadership is very poor! And the diversity across all areas is very poor! Not a company I would recommend if you are in a protected class! CFO only has male direct reports!

avatar
Risposta di Elanco
2y
Elanco strives to foster the inclusion of all employees, customers and stakeholders around the world, and celebrate the diversity of its individuals. We believe that fostering a culture of transparency and open communication is crucial to our success. We appreciate your sharing this feedback and it has been shared with leadership.

Esplora altre recensioni su Elanco

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Treats interns well by providing PTO during the summer shut down

Svantaggi

Didn't really have any issues with the internship.

2,0
20 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Svantaggi

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto