Heartless organization - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Environment Texas

1,0
8 lug 2017
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Not a single solitary one.

Svantaggi

They do not care about their employees. The rules for canvassing are: Absolutely no breaks If you need water, they will NOT provide it, nor will they allow you to run into a gas station to get any. The expectation is to ask the kind people at the doors to refill your water bottles. The problem with that is that you cannot go into the house at all, so you have to trust the stranger not to put anything in your water. If you have to go to the restroom during your 5 hours in the 100° Texas heat, you are expected to use a random porta potty, instead of finding a public bathroom. They only care about how much money you raise, and the turnover is ridiculous. No one in the office has been there longer than a month, including assistant directors.

Esplora altre recensioni su Environment Texas

5,0
23 set 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

lots of training and one and one mentorship

Svantaggi

The internship opportunities are unpaid

1,0
6 feb 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Independent projects and offers good insight into how environmental non-profits are run.

Svantaggi

Unpaid position in a poor work environment. Interns are hired by campaign associates who are mostly recent college grads using it as a stepping stone. I was essentially tasked with all the things the associate supervising me didn't want to do. I was frequently emailed outside of working hours to complete new tasks that hadn't been mentioned to me before in meetings. The associates and even the managing director were rude and passive aggressive at times during team meetings. They would ask for projects like creating pamphlets to be completed to a professional standard but there is no budget so you have to find a way to do things like that for free which can be challenging. The feedback would be mixed, the associate who the project would get submitted to would express satisfaction with the way the project turned out and then pass it along to the managing director who'd express dissatisfaction with the outcome so there wasn't a clear stream of communication about expectations.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto