Worst place to work - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Flagstar Bank

1,0
25 set 2013
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

There is no Pros I can say about this place

Svantaggi

Management are downers, they like to punish employees, they are never encouraging. You are expected to meet or exceed quota of loans per day, If you don't meet they count it against you. Always sending out reports called QC on a weekly basis to show each employee mistakes, according to the loan officer these are learning tools not to punish you. Ha not true you are allowed only 2% error ratio per year on mistakes you make on a loan. Training is bad, instructor had no inkling clue how to train you, kept calling or asking other employees for answers. Felt miserable in this place daily, not a happy place to work. I plan on telling others please do not bank or work at this place.

Esplora altre recensioni su Flagstar Bank

5,0
27 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Svantaggi

N/A during my time with the company

2,0
10 mar 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Svantaggi

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto