Generally a positive experience, with usual highs and lows. - Recensione dipendente - Senior Accountant presso Flagstar Bank

2,0
30 gen 2014
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Pleasant working conditions and facilities. Friendly culture. Variety of types of work assigned. The on-site cafeteria has good food and pleasant staff.

Svantaggi

Frequent cuts in staffing. Consistent lack of communication to employees. Constant turnover at the highest levels over the past 3 years. 20% staffing reduction by department, across the company. Career advancement difficult. Company spent thousands abd thousands of dollars to expand into leased space, then walked away from the space in less that 2 years, and eliminated more than 800 positions.

Esplora altre recensioni su Flagstar Bank

5,0
27 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Svantaggi

N/A during my time with the company

2,0
10 mar 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Svantaggi

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto