Company does not have a clue where it's going and how it's going to get there. - Recensione dipendente - Branch Management - Assistant Vice President presso Flagstar Bank

1,0
14 mag 2014
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Flagstar bank has some extremely loyal employees who love what they do and wants this company to succeed.

Svantaggi

The retail banking side of Flagstar is very unfocused. Weekly, if not daily focus is changed on a dime with no thought on how this affects the customer and it's own employees. Market managers are unwilling to listen to their own employees as to what the front line is hearing from it's customer base and when things are brought to middle managements attention it is just ignored. Market Managers use fear as a motivation, although this may work in the short term it will ultimately come back to haunt you in the end.

Esplora altre recensioni su Flagstar Bank

5,0
27 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Svantaggi

N/A during my time with the company

2,0
10 mar 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Svantaggi

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto