unacceptable - Recensione dipendente - Mortgage Underwriter presso Flagstar Bank

2,0
2 apr 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

It was good in the beginning-

Svantaggi

too many changes, too often lack of training to the extreme favoritism to its fullest if you are type A personality you are on the chopping block managers are in the dark worse than employees even if you were the top producer and giving it 100% if managers didn't like for her/his personal reason (while everyone else liked you) they will get rid of you- although you came in with a smile every day, took on jobs that were not yours- pushed to excel and to help others- they dont care!

Esplora altre recensioni su Flagstar Bank

5,0
27 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Svantaggi

N/A during my time with the company

2,0
10 mar 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Svantaggi

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto