Integrity and competency was never encouraged - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Global Financial Integrity

For those interested in financial crime, illicit financial flows, and their various forms, GFI offers valuable exposure to research, policy, and advocacy. The colleagues are highly supportive and collaborative.

No major cons, but the experience depends on your interest in this niche.

Good research publications and colleagues

1. Poor senior leadership, with no HR to turn to: all power is consolidated in the CEO, who is not a good manager and whose ethics I did not trust. I had serious reservations about timekeeping practices, as he directed me to fill out my timekeeping in a way that I feared constituted fraud, such as A. being told to bill to grants I wasn't working on and B. to record hours on a day I hadn't worked, to which I objected. I endured quite a bit of rudeness and isolation. For example, when I asked how to access the shared drive, the response I got was "I don't need to know everything that you don't know". 2. It was nearly impossible to get clear direction, and multiple self-initiated proposals I made to more completely fill my time were immediately shot down without any follow-on discussion, despite my asking to do so. It took the CEO nearly a month just to get me an account number I needed, and after this, when I offered to help create a good knowledge management system to prevent such messiness, he said that GFI was "too small for knowledge management". My perspective is that good KM is essential, especially in orgs with high turnover rates such as GFI, which lost almost half its people in a year. 3. As of June 2024, there were multiple warning signs of the org's decline and poor stewardship. There were multiple grant donor audits and a pending lawsuit by a former employee (not me; publicly available docs are searchable on the DC Courts website), and the aforementioned mass turnover in the past year, to include all 3 director positions. Charity Navigator gave GFI a score of 0/15 for its 74% liabilities-to-assets ratio in its last assessment. 4. I finally got a good deep research assignment after I'd given my notice, and after writing a solid 19-page draft in 2 weeks, in return I received a curt email that I would not be allowed to edit it, and that my name would not appear on the publication either. It felt petty and vindictive, and those behaviors benefitted no one and certainly not the overall organizational culture. I gave my best effort despite knowing I was about to leave, and in return for quality work a minimal amount of respect and courtesy would have been appreciated. The entire GFI experience was by far the most disappointing of my career, and almost entirely because of the CEO's lack of organization, planning, communication skills, manners, and questionable accounting practices.