AA&D: Avoid, Avert & Dodge - Recensione dipendente - Staff Assistant presso Harvard University

2,0
12 lug 2017
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

As everyone and their mother has mentioned on here, the benefits. They are great. There were so many Harvard-related offerings I wanted to take advantage of, and yet I soon found myself asking the question with dismay: WITH WHAT TIME OR ENERGY?!

Svantaggi

I spent less than a year in Alumni Affairs & Development aka AA&D (because here, even names of people are reduced to acronyms in an effort to save time, which is as precious and fugitive as the Golden Snitch). I barely escaped with my mental health. Everyone here is stressed out of their ever-loving minds. Worse yet is the culture of sorority-esque chipperness, phony facades smiling and excessively thanking (This is an honor for me/ No, it’s a greater honor for me / No, a greater honor for ME / And you must be Don Francisco’s sister / No, YOU must be Don Francisco’s sister) rather than bear the great shame of confessing to feeling overwhelmed. The sorority description is apt, if I do say, because the office of 300-400 or whatever is just about as diverse as one. In fact, you may look around and wonder if you ever left college at all! This is what Harvard loves to do: hire bright-eyed, unsuspecting, VERY recent college grads to fill promising-sounding Staff Assistant positions, while actually tricking them into performing the function of an EXECUTIVE Assistant (nay, two Executive Assistants) because it’s cheaper than hiring appropriately. The turnover rate is staggering, and this is why. HR knows this is why, but they are only there to serve the managers, not the lowly assistants. Granted, some Staff Assistant roles are doable, maybe even enjoyable, which is great for those people, but a gigantic injustice to the ones who have the same title and salary and yet are treated like Dobby the house elf. If you want to move up the ladder, have fun as a Coordinator! There are so many convoluted procedures in this office, so many “training” sessions to attend while you are also expected to jump into your role and keep on top of things, so much pressure to never make a mistake, to not take a real lunch, to utilize every single second of the day in proactive productivity so help you God. Corporate culture has thoroughly infiltrated. I got a look inside the belly of the beast, and it left me rather disgusted and disappointed.

Esplora altre recensioni su Harvard University

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

This place is huge, your mileage may vary based on which school and which department you work in - even in the same role. I have the best manager hands-down, and the team around me makes it all worth it.

Svantaggi

Pay is slow to advance, PTO stuck at 15ish days annual, career advancement is inconsistent

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great Union and benefits for non-profits/higher ed. Wonderful colleagues outside of leadership!

Svantaggi

GSD Development and Alumni Relations (under current leadership) is an incredibly toxic work environment. I didn't realize the intensity of the toll it took on my until after leaving, and I am not one to leave a negative review, but as they are hiring for several positions currently, I wish to share words of caution with applicants. Cons: - Absolutely not a safe space for anyone who is Black, brown, trans, queer, working-class, or disabled - 100% top-down direction. No room for personal exploration, initiative, or creativity. - Minimal guidance from leadership - Frequent pivots, even in the late stages of projects - Petty, immature talking behind your back by leadership - No upward mobility unless the Associate Dean or Dean like you - Deeply disingenuous comments, reflections, and feedback from leadership - Complete lack of transparency on direction, goals, etc. - Small mistakes are made cornerstones of performance evaluations, while leadership routinely missteps. Leadership never takes accountability. - Top-down policy decisions, completely lacking detail, thought, and care outside of legal ramifications - Ever-changing in-office requirements

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto