Great Employer Taken for Granted - Recensione dipendente - Human Resources Associate presso Harvard University

5,0
2 gen 2013
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Harvard is one of the few employers I have experienced that really cares about employees. Benefits are great, pay is always being analyzed, and it is truly mission-based. If I hadn't moved away I would probably have spent my whole career there.

Svantaggi

Different schools don't always communicate well. Pay is lower than private sector. Some issues with faculty and student egos.

Esplora altre recensioni su Harvard University

5,0
9 lug 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Highly dependent on your team, but my experience has been super positive. Everyone I've worked with are kind, smart, intellectually curious, which motivates me professionally and personally.

Svantaggi

This is not just for Harvard, but pay ranges are generally lower than industry. That's just academia.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great Union and benefits for non-profits/higher ed. Wonderful colleagues outside of leadership!

Svantaggi

GSD Development and Alumni Relations (under current leadership) is an incredibly toxic work environment. I didn't realize the intensity of the toll it took on my until after leaving, and I am not one to leave a negative review, but as they are hiring for several positions currently, I wish to share words of caution with applicants. Cons: - Absolutely not a safe space for anyone who is Black, brown, trans, queer, working-class, or disabled - 100% top-down direction. No room for personal exploration, initiative, or creativity. - Minimal guidance from leadership - Frequent pivots, even in the late stages of projects - Petty, immature talking behind your back by leadership - No upward mobility unless the Associate Dean or Dean like you - Deeply disingenuous comments, reflections, and feedback from leadership - Complete lack of transparency on direction, goals, etc. - Small mistakes are made cornerstones of performance evaluations, while leadership routinely missteps. Leadership never takes accountability. - Top-down policy decisions, completely lacking detail, thought, and care outside of legal ramifications - Ever-changing in-office requirements

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto