Great company and work balance with 9/80 Schedule - Recensione dipendente - Systems Integration and Test presso L3Harris

3,0
4 nov 2019
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

L3Harris is a good company. It has its challenges but overall is a decent Institution. If you want to work for it, I would say, go ahead and apply. 9/80 schedule, Super! Also the company will not fire you for any reasons, it reminds me a little bit the military, you have to really mess up in order to get fired. Thumb up!

Svantaggi

In my opinion, the company doesn't pay good compared to other companies; that is one of the reasons many people are leaving for more competitive salaries. I gave a rating of 3/5 because of this reason.

avatar
Risposta di L3Harris
6y
Thank you for providing your feedback. We are glad to hear you are able to enjoy our flexible scheduling with the 9/80! We do a yearly analysis of our total compensation package to ensure we are competitive with the market. Additionally, we have a pay-for-performance culture, and annual raises are provided based on each employee's performance the previous year.

Esplora altre recensioni su L3Harris

5,0
6 apr 2026
Stagista anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.

Svantaggi

The workplace was old and outdated.

2,0
5 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Svantaggi

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto