Large contractor with too much corporate oversight - Recensione dipendente - Software Engineer presso L3Harris

3,0
18 lug 2020
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Several areas of work to explore Extensive benefits Initially competitive pay

Svantaggi

Weighed down by corporate Not much value on the little guy IT infrastructure is a hindrance on work Path for advancement unclear or overly complex

avatar
Risposta di L3Harris
5y
Thanks for leaving us a review. We want to ensure you have the tools you need to do your work well. If you are finding obstacles preventing you from being agile, please reach out to your manager to discuss ways your processes can be potentially be improved. We'd also love to hear your input through our employee engagement survey, which will help tell our senior leaders where we should focus to continuously improve our employee experience.

Esplora altre recensioni su L3Harris

5,0
6 apr 2026
Stagista anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.

Svantaggi

The workplace was old and outdated.

2,0
5 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Svantaggi

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto