Decent job with poor management and corporate structure - Recensione dipendente - Integration Test Engineer presso L3Harris

3,0
11 lug 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Stable government contracts when compared to other defense contractors

Svantaggi

Poor management Terrible pay increases (capped at 10 percent for promotions). They will hire somebody from the outside and pay them more, but hamstring internal -already qualified- candidates.

avatar
Risposta di L3Harris
4y
We are committed to building a robust, diverse leadership pipeline and to promoting from within for all roles and especially for management and executive positions. If your interested in learning about further career opportunities, we encourage you to reach out to your HR Business Partner.

Esplora altre recensioni su L3Harris

5,0
12 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Work of life balance was amazing

Svantaggi

Could run out of work due to it being contracts.

2,0
5 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Svantaggi

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto