Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      L3Harris

      Azienda coinvolta

      Recensioni su L3Harris

      Review Summary - Recensione dipendente - Senior Program Manager presso L3Harris

      3,0
      5 ago 2021
      Senior program manager
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      Large defense contractor, challenging work, good working team environment. Traditional Aerospace and Defense Company. Usually large programs requiring a multitude of functional support departments.

      Svantaggi

      Financial driven to the nth degree, Switch from traditional PTO System to Unlimited, which isn't unlimited. Only decreases their expense in carrying traditional PTO payouts. Limited ability to have career growth dependent upon site locations.

      avatar
      Risposta di L3Harris
      4y
      Thank you for your review. We agree with you that the work we do is challenging and mission aligned. We encourage employees to create and maintain their Employee Experience Record, an internal resume, to highlight their skills and experience. This online record is searchable by managers and HR professionals to assist with staffing key programs with talented internal resources. We also offer our Internal Opportunity Program that provides visibility and ability for all employees to apply to open positions across our businesses.

      Esplora altre recensioni su L3Harris

      5,0
      12 apr 2026
      Aircraft electrician
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      Work of life balance was amazing

      Svantaggi

      Could run out of work due to it being contracts.

      2,0
      5 giu 2026
      Director, operations management
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

      Svantaggi

      Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

      Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto
      Ricerche correlate: Offerte di lavoro di L3Harris | Stipendi di L3Harris | Benefit di L3Harris | Colloqui di L3Harris
      Recensioni su L3HarrisRecensioni per Senior Program Manager presso L3HarrisRecensione su L3Harris