Good start as a college grad not good for experienced people - Recensione dipendente - Procurement Analyst presso L3Harris

3,0
5 gen 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- good pay out of college - great people to work with - easy enough job - good support - laid back environment

Svantaggi

- poorly managed - conservative work environment - conservative approach to work, new ideas not integrated - not much opportunity to grow -you wont learn more than your job role -you will be put inside a box and cannot be a free thinker

avatar
Risposta di L3Harris
4y
Thank you for your review. We are glad to hear you enjoyed the work and working with our highly skilled employees. Employees can suggest and implement new ideas, processes or projects through our continuous improvement platform e3. Employees can always speak with their manager, HR Business Partner or ethics adviser to raise any questions or concerns.

Esplora altre recensioni su L3Harris

5,0
8 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Svantaggi

They doesn't allow remote work

2,0
5 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Svantaggi

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto