Infested with Nepotism - Recensione dipendente - Quality Control Linguist presso Leidos

1,0
29 mar 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Large company that supports the gov with overpaid contract positions. Easy to get promoted and even skip ranks as long as you know someone at the management level.

Svantaggi

Infested with Nepotism, the company have a dedicated Equal Opportunity team that strive to report "Zero" and fake awards for being free of EO complaints and nepotism. The EO team get rewarded for having no complaints!! in other words when someone files any complaint, they will try to dismiss it and accuse him for wrong doing. Officials are hired based on friendship and flirting therefore it is hard to find someone with integrity, most of them carry fake credentials and exaggerated work experience. If you are well educated and experienced in your field don't bother working at Leidos because you will end up being managed by someone who's been appointed by a friend and who is far less competent than yourself, and when it is time for promotions, you will find yourself behind mediocre employees that are experts in flirting with management.

Esplora altre recensioni su Leidos

5,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Svantaggi

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Svantaggi

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto