Evolving company with opportunities to be successful - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Leidos

4,0
2 apr 2015
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Opportunities to separate yourself from the "pack" if you're willing to do the work and establish yourself as a strong performer. Improving communication and transparency from company leaders. Working to identify areas of improvement and attempting to improve certain areas. Creating a company identity is a work in progress after company split but there's evidence of improvement. Ability to communicate and share feedback with company leadership, management, HR, etc. Decent work/life balance and flexible work schedule depending on the role being performed.

Svantaggi

Sometimes the message from company leaders doesn't make it to the individual contributors. Endless amount of change to the company, culture, and benefits has resulted in low morale and a perceived lack of appreciation. Sense of entitlement among employees who are busy living in the past and not in reality (as it relates to company benefits, budgets, etc.). Few opportunities for training/development, educational opportunities, etc.

Esplora altre recensioni su Leidos

5,0
20 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

great work life balance nice

Svantaggi

none, i like it here

3,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Svantaggi

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto