Overall fine - Recensione dipendente - Cyber Security Engineer presso Leidos

4,0
3 ott 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Decent work life balance (customer-depending). A lot of programs within Leidos. I haven't had the opportunity to take advantage of them as much as I would like. PTO is accrued per pay period. Leidos internal mobility program is 100% the best! I can't say enough positive things about the internal mobility group.

Svantaggi

-I was the top performer, only person who was rated the highest performance score in my division. Yet I was still paid more than 30K LESS THAN MY MALE COUNTERPARTS (equal jobs and I was the highest performer). There is no competition, I out performed every single one of them and no one would deny it. -Not necessarily a negative but- In my years with Leidos my work has been primarily for my customers. I think for most customer facing employees there is very little actual sense of "Leidos community".

Esplora altre recensioni su Leidos

5,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Svantaggi

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Svantaggi

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto