Complete lack of support and direction - Recensione dipendente - Mechanical Engineer presso Leidos

2,0
10 nov 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Pay and benefits were good

Svantaggi

Purchasing and inventory departments at the Vista location are a complete joke, it is astounding that they are able to produce anything at all. Project priorities are shifted at the drop of a hat. Project timelines are not communicated to engineers at all, so individuals are left to prioritize their own work based on what seems more urgent, and when everything is urgent, nothing is. I was frequently denied resources needed to do my job, my boss couldn’t be bothered to join my design reviews and I couldn’t get email responses from upper management. Total void of support. Project requirements were laughably vague, one brief was simply “Design must give the user a positive experience”. Expectations were not communicated and designs were not reviewed in enough detail. Upper management openly insulted designs- (“Polishing a turd”, “kludgey”) without providing any support on the front end of the project.

Esplora altre recensioni su Leidos

5,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Svantaggi

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Svantaggi

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto