Leidos is a Horrible Company That Offers its Employees the Bare Minimum Across the Board - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Leidos

1,0
21 gen 2016
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

None. I've seen some positive reviews on this site for Leidos - take these with a big grain of salt...

Svantaggi

Below is a list of negatives that I experienced while I worked at Leidos: - Poor compensation and benefits; objectively speaking the pay and benefits Leidos offers are definitively below average - A toxic environment where dishonest co-workers will throw you under the bus any chance they can get (however, there were a few decent people where I worked) - Management is dishonest; they also insult and scream at employees - A mentorship program is in place for younger engineers but the more senior engineers didn't take it seriously and it ultimately provided no benefit whatsoever - Members of management regularly bad-mouthed clients behind their backs - An endless amount of empty promises from upper management - Where I worked, the management team was pretty incompetent And the list goes on... In summation, I would tell any professional to think very hard before taking up employment with Leidos.

Esplora altre recensioni su Leidos

5,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Svantaggi

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Svantaggi

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto