Great Company - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso MIT Lincoln Laboratory
5,0
30 mar 2016
Dipendente anonimo
Dipendente attuale
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale
Vantaggi
Very smart people, almost everyone has a PhD and knows their stuff inside and out. Would recommend very highly to anyone intrested
Svantaggi
Projects can sometimes move slowly. A much slower pace than companies in private sector, which could be a pro or con depending on what youre looking for
Risposta di MIT Lincoln Laboratory
10y
We appreciate your insights. Overall, about a third of our technical staff are PhD's, a third have Master's Degrees, and a third have Bachelor's Degrees. We are fortunate to be able to attract highly qualified candidates at each level. It is sometimes the case that a project will move slowly. At times that is the nature of research work as it is sometimes hard to break new ground.
Esplora altre recensioni su MIT Lincoln Laboratory
It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.
Svantaggi
Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.
Worked with some of the smartest people I’ve ever known.
Great opportunities to learn from your coworkers and an atmosphere that encourages learning, including a well-run technical education program.
Fabulous support staff and technicians that can get seemingly impossible things done quickly.
Great resources and lab spaces (if a bit dated).
The nature of the work encourages good work/life balance.
Fantastic benefits (though the pay is low).
Svantaggi
No/limited opportunities for advancement makes this a hard place to work mid-career.
Good engineers are promoted to be mediocre managers.
Every program is under-funded, under-staffed, and over schedule.
Bad managers are shuffled around but rarely fired.