Non è un ottimo posto per essere un ingegnere del software - Recensione dipendente - Senior Software Engineer presso Mastercard

2,0
29 lug 2020
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Esiste un'ottima politica 401k, ma l'alta dirigenza ama ignorare altri problemi spingendo costantemente su quanto sia grande la politica 401k.

Svantaggi

APT, una società acquisita da Mastercard, era un ottimo posto in cui lavorare, ma Mastercard ha ucciso la cultura aziendale che aveva un tempo APT. Nonostante affermi di essere un'azienda tecnologica, Mastercard ha ridotto del 15% gli stipendi per le nuove assunzioni nei campus tecnologici, ha tagliato i numerosi vantaggi dell'ufficio che avevamo e ha istituito tonnellate di burocrazia per quasi tutti i processi di base. Gli ingegneri del software non sono apprezzati e l'organizzazione nel suo complesso ha una cultura dello sviluppo in outsourcing, anche per progetti critici per l'azienda. Molti dei migliori ingegneri sono già partiti per pascoli più verdi. Non consiglierei Mastercard Data and Services come un buon posto in cui lavorare per i nuovi assunti nel campus.

Esplora altre recensioni su Mastercard

5,0
23 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

People are highly intelligent and things seem to operate efficiently

Svantaggi

Large ship so changes are hard to make

4,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Svantaggi

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto