Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      McKesson

      Azienda coinvolta

      Recensioni su McKesson

      Anonymous Current Employee - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso McKesson

      3,0
      22 lug 2012
      Dipendente anonimo
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      - The senior leadership team has been in places for several years, creating credibility with shareholders and the marketplace - Generally speaking, the workforce is passionate and easygoing - There's a significant number of opportunities across the company, making it possible to move around both geographically and functionally

      Svantaggi

      - Executive compensation creates a real difference between top execs and the rest of the workforce, resulting in a hierarchical culture - The company is very consensus driven, which causesdecisions to happen slowly. If you operate in the lower levels, you may feel that you are handcuffed by the people above needing to "weigh-in" on everything - The company doesn't foster a strong internal culture - creating so-so morale. Some groups do a better job than others, but on the whole, you don't feel connected to your co-workers outside of your immediate work group.

      Esplora altre recensioni su McKesson

      5,0
      26 giu 2026
      Sales solutions manager
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      Flexible schedule Good leadership Supportive team

      Svantaggi

      Hard to move up Customers can be difficult

      1,0
      3 giu 2026
      Dipendente anonimo
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

      Svantaggi

      1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

      1
      avatar
      Risposta di McKesson
      1mo
      Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
      Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto
      Ricerche correlate: Offerte di lavoro di McKesson | Stipendi di McKesson | Benefit di McKesson | Colloqui di McKesson
      Recensioni su McKessonRecensione su McKesson