Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      McKesson

      Azienda coinvolta

      Recensioni su McKesson

      I've seen better, and worse. - Recensione dipendente - Information Technology presso McKesson

      3,0
      20 lug 2015
      Information technology
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      Generous Paid Time Off, fellow employees, location, amenities in the building, average salary is fine for healthcare (maybe not so great in Houston, where O&G rule), there is room to advance

      Svantaggi

      Leadership team seems to care very little for anything but the bottom line. There doesn't appear to be much concern for patient care, although they preach it. Much more value placed on off-the-street candidates than internal ones. External hires tend to come in making more than the staff with tenure, which doesn't do much for the sense of team here. VP level leadership has no clear vision and it leaves the teams at odds with each other.

      Esplora altre recensioni su McKesson

      5,0
      28 mag 2026
      Field sales development representative
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      Great benefits, culture, and work-life balance

      Svantaggi

      No cons to report on the company.

      avatar
      Risposta di McKesson
      4w
      Thank you for your review! We’re so glad your experience at McKesson has been a great one. Together, we are shaping the future of health for our patients, our communities, our people, and you.
      1,0
      3 giu 2026
      Dipendente anonimo
      Consiglia
      Gradimento del CEO
      Pronostico commerciale

      Vantaggi

      1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

      Svantaggi

      1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

      1
      avatar
      Risposta di McKesson
      4w
      Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
      Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto
      Ricerche correlate: Offerte di lavoro di McKesson | Stipendi di McKesson | Benefit di McKesson | Colloqui di McKesson
      Recensioni su McKessonRecensioni per Information Technology presso McKessonRecensione su McKesson