Disloyal, Untrustworthy Employer. Not the place to build a career. - Recensione dipendente - Project Engineer presso PepsiCo

1,0
13 nov 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

High stress high workload environment, with an always short handed management structure that will leave you feeling constantly pressured to sacrifice work life balance. Not the worst pay, until you calculate it to hours worked. Some good people to work with, who are also grinding their bones and blood for a soulless company. DEI is about the only thing they do well, so well that it is a detriment to getting the best candidate for the role.

Svantaggi

Unless you are in the worst positions to work in the company, your job is never safe. Restructuring has on multiple occasions forced people out of the company after 20-30 years of service, with a weeks notice. Closed entire manufacturing locations down with zero notice to the employees. They will bleed you out whenever possible to mask their poor senior leadership to the shareholders.

Esplora altre recensioni su PepsiCo

5,0
1 lug 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great Company to work for.

Svantaggi

Not that many cons to be honest.

4,0
6 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Worked for PepsiCo for 10 years across four locations in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Florida. Gained experience in multiple sales and operational roles while supporting account growth, merchandising, and customer relationships. Florida locations were especially well-operated and efficient. PepsiCo provided competitive pay, solid benefits through Keystone, and a good vacation package compared to competitors in the beverage industry. The company also offered strong sales incentive programs, earning rewards such as Orlando Magic floor seats, Pro Bowl tickets, Apple Watches, and Yeti cups for exceeding performance goals and driving sales results.

Svantaggi

While PepsiCo promotes internal growth opportunities, many promotions and leadership opportunities appeared to favor college internship hires over long-term internal employees. In some cases, newer college-based management pushed corporate initiatives without fully understanding local market realities or account volume trends. For example, innovation products were sometimes forced into low-volume accounts where sell-through was unrealistic. Operationally, certain delivery processes could be improved, particularly with Tropicana products being stored in coolers on trucks for extended periods, which could impact product quality and increase waste. Work-life balance could also be challenging, as sales representatives commonly worked 50–60 hour weeks. Expectations from corporate leadership were often unrealistic, especially when customer representatives and drivers were expected to fully stock stores while servicing 15+ accounts per day. Experiences could also vary depending on whether locations were union or non-union operated.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto